throw out aggregate limits on individual contributions in a single two-year cycle, saying they violate free speech. "If these advocate limitations go down, 500 people will control American democracy. It would be 'government for the 500 people,' not for anybody else -- and thats the risk," says Burt Neuborne, law professor and founding legal director of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School. On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts indicated he is prepared to strike down caps on donations to individual candidates, but perhaps not on donations to political committees. Justice Antonin Scalia appears to be set to back the lifting of all limits. "The Scalia side says, 'Look if you're rich, you're entitled to have as much influence as you can buy,'" Neuborne says. "And the Scalia side has won 5-to-4 consistently in recent years."
"500 People Will Control American Democracy"
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to strike down most of the
remaining limits on massive spending by wealthy donors on political
campaigns. On Tuesday, justices heard arguments in McCutcheon v. Federal
Election Commission, which has been referred to as "the next Citizens
United." Republican leaders and wealthy GOP donor Shaun McCutcheon wants
the Supreme Court to
throw out aggregate limits on individual contributions in a single two-year cycle, saying they violate free speech. "If these advocate limitations go down, 500 people will control American democracy. It would be 'government for the 500 people,' not for anybody else -- and thats the risk," says Burt Neuborne, law professor and founding legal director of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School. On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts indicated he is prepared to strike down caps on donations to individual candidates, but perhaps not on donations to political committees. Justice Antonin Scalia appears to be set to back the lifting of all limits. "The Scalia side says, 'Look if you're rich, you're entitled to have as much influence as you can buy,'" Neuborne says. "And the Scalia side has won 5-to-4 consistently in recent years."
throw out aggregate limits on individual contributions in a single two-year cycle, saying they violate free speech. "If these advocate limitations go down, 500 people will control American democracy. It would be 'government for the 500 people,' not for anybody else -- and thats the risk," says Burt Neuborne, law professor and founding legal director of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School. On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts indicated he is prepared to strike down caps on donations to individual candidates, but perhaps not on donations to political committees. Justice Antonin Scalia appears to be set to back the lifting of all limits. "The Scalia side says, 'Look if you're rich, you're entitled to have as much influence as you can buy,'" Neuborne says. "And the Scalia side has won 5-to-4 consistently in recent years."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment